User blog comment:The Boomerang/Angry Birds vs. Clash of Clans/@comment-8425539-20150118211031/@comment-4794476-20150118225553

Sure, but take a look at the similarities. Notice how they BOTH are abreviations? They both stand for something other than the misleading name they have. They also are both the strongest and last character to be unlocked out of the originals. They are also both robot creatures.

Sure, Angry Birds is shorter than Clash of Clans, but that's because Rovio puts effort into their games. When Clash of Clans makes an update, it takes so little effort. Get a new upgrade for a building, make it an unbelievable price so players HAVE to make in-app purchases, then make it a long time so the update lasts longer. On their "campagin map", you have to notice they have such little levels, wheras Angry Birds has hundreds. They put thought into each and every one. Otherwise, it'd be as bad as Clash of Clans. In Clash of Clans, exactly. You literally always have something to do. Because it takes forever to gather currency (plus occasional attacks) to get one thing done. And then you go to the next building. This repeats on and on until they go, oop! Time to make a new update! And then you have to gather 0 to a gazillion in order to get a new troop. And why do you get a new troop? So you can attack to get MORE loot to get another troop. It's just a riveting cycle that constantly goes on and on.